CT-Guided vs. Navigational Bronchoscopic Biopsies for Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is the second most common cause of death by cancer. Multiple modalities can be used to obtain a tissue sample from a pulmonary nodule. We aimed to compare the yield and adverse events related to transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) and Electromagnetic Navigation Biopsy (ENB) at our institution. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in which all patients referred for evaluation of a pulmonary lesion over 5 years (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018) were identified. Our primary outcome was to compare the accuracy of TTNA to that of ENB in establishing the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of the adverse events and the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of each modality. RESULTS: A total of 1006 patients were analyzed. The mean age of patients in the TTNA and the ENB group was 67.2 ± 11.2 years and 68.3 ± 9.2 years respectively. Local anesthesia was predominantly used for TTNA and moderate sedation was more commonly used in the ENB group. We found ENB to have an accuracy of 57.1%, with a sensitivity of 40.0%, a specificity of 100.0%, a positive predictive value of 100.0%, and a negative predictive value of 40.0%. As for the TTNA, the accuracy was 75.9%, with a sensitivity of 77.5%, a specificity of 61.5%, a positive predictive value of 95.0%, and a negative predictive value of 22.5%. The rate of clinically significant complications was higher in the TTNA group (8.2%) as compared to the ENB group (4.7%) with a p-value < 0.001. CONCLUSION: TTNA was superior to ENB-guided biopsy for the diagnostic evaluation of lung nodules. However, the complication rate was much higher in the TTNA group as compared to the ENB group.

Effect of a surgical observership on the perceptions and career choices of preclinical medical students: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Medical students are increasingly choosing nonsurgical specialties; observership programs can address factors influencing them toward surgical careers by allowing preclerkship exposure and mentorship, and correcting misconceptions. The aims of this study were to assess the influence of a peer-led observership program at the Université de Montréal on the career choices of preclinical medical students and to determine the factors associated with a positive observership experience. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental convergent mixed-methods questionnaire design. From Nov. 19 to Dec. 31, 2018, and Mar. 1 to Apr. 4, 2019, all medical students participating in the observership program were eligible for the study; there were no ineligibility criteria. Using a prospective purposive sampling method, we recruited students via the email sent to confirm their observership. In the week after their observership, we invited the students by email to complete a postintervention survey. We used nonparametric tests to evaluate the impact of the observership on participants' career choices and an inductive data-driven thematic analysis to analyze their responses. RESULTS: Of the 204 students who participated, 157 provided consent, of whom 85 (54.1%) completed questionnaires both before and after the observership. The majority of participants were interested in a surgical specialty before (72 [85%]) and after (68 [84%]) the observership. There was no significant change in the students' choices of surgical specialties after the observership. However, most (68 [81%]) reported being more interested in a surgical career as a result of the observership, which allowed them to see that the type of practice they considered was congruent with a surgical career. Their perceptions of the field of surgery became positive, particularly regarding its pace and atmosphere and the humanistic patient-doctor relationship it required. The experience was influenced by surgeons' and teams' attitudes toward students, knowledge-sharing and quality of exposure. Participants mentioned that their willingness to participate was in part responsible for the success of their experience. CONCLUSION: This observership program allowed an early, positive introduction of students to surgery while challenging stereotypes. It provided a better understanding of surgery, enabling participants to consider this field and potentially influencing their residency application.

Comparing the effectiveness of simulation as adjuncts to standardized lectures, on the identification and reporting of intimidation during surgical clerkship: A mixed method randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intimidation constitutes a learning barrier for undergraduates and its reporting rate to authorities remains suboptimal. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of three interventions designed to increase reporting by undergraduates during their surgical rotation. As adjuncts to a standardized lecture, participants were assigned to a simulated intimidation scenario, a video of intimidation events, or a control group. Surveys were completed before the interventions, and at the end of the rotation. RESULTS: Of the 119 included participants, 17.6% reported that they had been intimidated during their previous rotation as compared to 37.0% after the surgical rotation. There were no statistically significant differences in the reporting of intimidation between the groups. However, 65.5% of all participants declared feeling more at ease to report intimidation, yet the reporting rate remained low. CONCLUSION: Intimidation during clerkship persists as a frequent problem although the best method to increase its reporting remains unclear.

Combined Endosonographic Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Node-Negative Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in High-Risk Patients.

Positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) is routinely utilized to investigate lymph node (LN) metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer. However, it is less sensitive in normal-sized LNs. This study was performed in order to define the prevalence of mediastinal LN metastases discovered on combined endosonography by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle aspiration in patients with a radiologically normal mediastinum. This study consists of a retrospective, single-institution, tertiary care referral center review of a prospectively maintained database. Patients were identified from a cohort between January 2009 and December 2014. One hundred and sixty-one patients with biopsy-proven, non-small-cell lung cancer were identified in whom both the preendosonography CT and PET-CT were negative for mediastinal LN metastases. Combined endosonography (EBUS + EUS-FNA) was performed in all patients. Z test was used for statistical analysis. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 161 consecutive patients were included. Patients were staged if they had central tumor, tumor size >3 cm, N1 lymph node involvement on PET-CT/CT, or if there was low SUV (<2.5) in the primary tumor. A total of 416 lymph nodes were biopsied in the 161 patients using combined endosonography; 147 with EBUS and 269 with EUS. Mean and median number of lymph nodes biopsied per patient using combined EBUS/EUS was 2.5 and 3, respectively (mean and median EBUS: 0.91 and 2.5; mean and median EUS 1.6 and 3). Endosonographic staging upstaged 13% of patients with radiologically normal lymph nodes in the mediastinum, hilum, lobar, and sublobar regions (confidence interval 8.22-19.20). Twenty-one out of 161 patients (13%) with radiologically normal mediastinum were positive on combined EBUS/EUS staging. Out of 21 patients upstaged on endosonography, 15 (71%) had tumor size >3 cm. Six (28%) had occult N1 disease. Thirteen (61%) had occult N2 disease and 2 (9%) had adrenal involvement. None of the upstaged patients had N1 LN involvement on PET-CT or CT scan. Combined endosonographic lymph node staging should be considered in the pretreatment staging of high-risk patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in the presence of radiologically normal mediastinal lymph nodes due to the significant rate of radiologically occult lymph node metastases.

Conceptual and methodological challenges of studies examining the determinants and outcomes of omitted nursing care: A narrative review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades, several studies have examined the determinants and outcomes of omitted nursing care in hospitals and other settings. These studies have raised several challenges associated with the definition and measurement of this phenomenon which must be addressed to move the field forward. However, these challenges remain scattered throughout the literature. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the conceptual and methodological challenges of studies examining the determinants and outcomes of omitted nursing care, and to identify avenues for further research. METHOD: A narrative review of the literature was conducted. Relevant studies published between 2001 and 2018 were identified using four electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane Library and Health Management Database. Study selection, data extraction, and synthesis were carried independently by two authors following a standardized protocol, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Thematic analysis was used to summarize and characterize the main conceptual and methodological challenges identified. RESULTS: Our initial search yielded 5214 citations of which 52 primary studies and 7 literature reviews met our inclusion criteria. Six conceptual and methodological challenges were identified, the: 1) use of self-reported measures; 2) use of cross-sectional designs; 3) multidimensional nature of omitted nursing care; 4) interdisciplinary and collaborative nature of health care, 5) content validity of existing instruments and, 6) multiplicity of conceptual definitions. CONCLUSION: We identified six challenges that characterize studies on the determinants and outcomes of omitted nursing care. For each, several solutions are proposed. To strengthen this body of evidence, patient-level longitudinal studies should be pursued. It is also required to develop and validate more objective measures of omitted nursing care. Developing such measures must involve registered nurses at the bedside, to ensure their feasibility and acceptability.